Zuletzt aktualisiert:
Paris-Aligned Benchmark (PAB) and Climate Transition Benchmark (CTB) labels require transparent decarbonisation trajectories, reporting on scope coverage, and adherence to benchmark methodology constraints. Asset managers must explain how indices meet pathway tests and how data gaps are handled. Earthian delivers forward-looking climate and transition inference to support benchmark factsheets, prospectus language, and ongoing investor reporting.
PAB and CTB investors scrutinize year-on-year decarbonisation, sector exclusions, and the quality of emissions inputs. Earthian helps managers document forward scenarios—where transition risk could accelerate or slow real-world alignment—so reporting is not only backward-looking carbon intensity charts.
Many constituents have partial Scope 3 or sector-specific gaps. Earthian inference can support conservative gap-filling narratives where regulation permits, with explicit uncertainty bands and governance review—reducing greenwashing exposure in client communications.
When methodologies evolve, administrators must communicate changes clearly. Earthian Hub can version scenario sets so benchmark update letters reference consistent intelligence snapshots across indices and vintages.
Labeled products often intersect SFDR precontractual and periodic disclosures. Earthian allows shared metrics and narratives between PAB/CTB reporting and SFDR templates—one source of truth for climate KPIs.
Upgrade benchmark reporting with scenario-native climate intelligence: